• About Us
  • Brain Injury Network (BIN)
  • Abuse, Expoitation, Victimization
  • Academic Attribution
  • Blast Exposure Brain Injury
  • Ban Football
  • Brain Injury Survivor Priorities
  • Brain Injury Advocacy by and for People
  • Brain Injury Advocates Book
  • Brain Injury Network Forums
  • Brain Injury Survivor Identifiers
  • Brain Injury Survivor Movement
  • By and For the Brain Injury Survivors
  • California Dept. of Rehabilitation
  • California or Local
  • Calif. Senate Health Committee Testimony
  • Cautionary Tale
  • College Disability Programs
  • Contact Us
  • DOR CA TBI
  • Easy Picture Links
  • Easy Text Version
  • Health Care Reform
  • Hospital Trauma Centers
  • How You Can Help
  • Human Rights of People With Brain Injury
  • International Standards
  • Laws and Legislation
  • Lawyers and Attorneys
  • LInk To Us
  • LINKS
  • Mandated Reporters
  • mTBI and Neuroimaging
  • National Standards
  • Online Community
  • Please Donate to the BIN
  • Policy Advocacy ABI Forum
  • Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19 (PASC)
  • Postsecondary BI Programs
  • Postsecondary Protocols
  • Post-TBI Syndrome Dear Medical Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Protect Your Privacy
  • Public Policy
  • Public Policy in Chronological Order
  • Public Policy Index
    • Best Practice Guidelines
    • Bicycle Helmet Law
    • Brain Injury Community
    • Brain Injury and Parental Rights
    • Building Code Standards
    • Classification of TBI
    • Clinical Research
    • Cognitive Retraining
    • Community Reintegration
    • Comprehensive Health Reform
    • Concussion and Sports
    • Conflict of Interest in Medical Research
    • Counselor Training
    • Crime
    • Department of Mental Health
    • Devicing While Driving
    • Disability Rights and Issues
    • Disclosures, Advocates
    • Disclosures, Medical Providers
    • Disclosures, Researchers
    • Disclosures, Web Sites
    • Doctor Education
    • Driving While Devicing
    • Drug Companies
    • Empowerment, Patient
    • Exposing Brain Injury Survivors' Identie
    • Feeding Tube
    • Financial Institutions
    • Fluorescent Lighting Mandate Waiver
    • Food and Water
    • Funding Priorities for Survivors
    • Gold Standard Research Studies
    • Helmet Laws
    • High School Graduation
    • Hospital Privacy and Consent
    • Hospital Settings and Patients
    • Hospital Trauma Centers in the USA
    • Human Research Guidelines
    • Identification as People
    • Law-Abiding Survivors
    • Incarcerated Criminals with ABI
    • Law Enforcement
    • Laws and Recommendation
    • Least Restrictive Living Environment
    • Living Environments
    • Local and County Services
    • Locked Facilities
    • Mandated Medical Review
    • Mandated Reporter Law
    • Medical Device Makers
    • Mental Illness
    • National Centers: Costly Duplication
    • Nursing Home Placements
    • Nutrition and Hydration
    • Online Recruitment of Patients
    • Patient Recruitment to Medical Studies
    • Organizations or Providers Offering Mone
    • Parental Rights and Brain Injury
    • Patient Data Harvesting
    • Patient Empowerment
    • Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)
    • Persistent Wakeful but Unaware State
    • Physician Disclosures
    • Political Correctness
    • Political Sensitivity
    • Post-Acute Medical Environments
    • PostConcussion Syndrome
    • PCS is Physiological in Origin
    • Post-Secondary Education
    • Post-Secondary Programs
    • Privacy Online
    • Privacy Settings on Web Sites
    • Profiting from Exposing Our Identities
    • Psychologist and Counselor Training
    • Psychotropic Drugs, Use of
    • PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)
    • Post-TBI Syndrome-Proposal
    • QEEG
    • Raising Money to Promote Med. Research
    • Recruitment Methodology
    • Removal of Life Support
    • Research Studies Full Disclosure
    • School Age Children with ABI
    • Sports or Athletics Activities
    • Skiing and Helmets
    • Social Community On-Line Networking
    • Social Media Recruitment
    • Sports Medical Review
    • Stakeholders, Third Party
    • State Brain Injury Survivor Councils
    • Stigma and Brain Injury
    • Stigma, Marginalization, Stereotypical
    • Strokes are not TBIs
    • Subclassification Hierarchy of ABI
    • Support Group Facilitation
    • Survivor Advocacy
    • Survivor Advocates
    • Survivor Identity, Exposure of
    • Survivor Community Priorities
    • Survivor Stories in Media
    • TBI is a Subset of ABI
    • Terminology
    • The Term "Survivor"
    • Universal Health Care
    • Veterans, US Armed Forces
    • Victimization
  • Search This Site or the Net
  • Services Prioritization
  • Survivor Advisory Council
  • Survivors As Stakeholders
  • The Survivors' Point of View
    • A Chronic Disease
    • A Cure for Brain Injury?
    • A Stroke is Not a TBI
    • Advocates: Conflicts of Interest
    • Brain Injury Awareness
    • Brain Injury Support Groups
    • Can We Be "Trained"?
    • Definitions of ABI and TBI
    • Facebook Is Not Safe
    • 2009 Independence Day Message
    • Internet Providers Share Your Info
    • Medical Designations
    • Our Own Advocacy
    • Politically Correct Terminology
    • Post-TBi Syndrome (PTBIS)
    • Research, Clinical Trials, Studies and P
    • SABI Brain Injury Advocacy Forum
    • SABI
    • Survivor Organizations
    • Social Communities
    • Use of the Term "Survivor"
    • Why We Need Collective Advocacy
  • What We Survivors Need
  • Who Represents Us?
  • Worldwide Brain Injury Community Awarene
  • Blank 2
Donate
DONATE

National Standards for Postsecondary (College Level) Brain Injury Programming

SUMMARY:

BIN is calling for national standards for post-secondary (college) programs for students with acquired brain injuries. A system ensuring high standards and accountability is needed to protect adult students with abi.
The Brain Injury Network, a survivor-led and operated association of people with acquired brain injuries from traumatic brain injury (tbi), stroke, tumor, illness and other abi categories, is advocating for national standards for acquired brain injury programs at colleges and universities. Indeed, international standards are needed. But since the Brain Injury Network originates in California, U.S.A., we are first calling for standards to be implemented in the United States of America.
It has dawned on us that new laws are needed to protect adults with cognitive challenges who attend colleges all across the United States. It may be possible for the interested parties to help formulate and pass laws that will help the millions of survivors in the national brain injury community. Therefore, this information is now being disseminated across the United States to the stakeholders we can think of in the hopes that you will join BIN in calling for these laws, standards, and reforms.
New, effective August 1, 2006: BIN is calling for a system of regulation, review and standards nationwide for utilization in college and other post-secondary disability programs.

Regulation, Review and Standards For College and Other Post-Secondary Level Disability Programs Are Needed

NATIONAL STANDARDS:

Nationwide standards are needed in post-secondary programs for adult students with acquired brain injuries. Such standards must be based on sound educational and rehabilitative theory. Such standards must provide model protocol and programming objectives for college and university level disability programs for adults with cognitive challenges. Please see program recommendations on this website for some ideas regarding standards.

REGULATION OF COLLEGE DISABILITY PROGRAMS:

There must be regulation of college disability programs. If someone is mistreated at a hospital or nursing home, in California there is a state agency regulator that can be contacted so that an investigation will be launched and conducted. There needs to be such a system for college disability programs, so that if there is a criminal event or harm or even death comes to a student when they are at a college, the student or the victim’s family, or other concerned citizens can make a complaint that will be investigated, and appropriate corrective action will be undertaken. As it is now, who even has the authority to investigate a college’s disability programming or order a college to improve the quality of its disability related programming?

REVIEW OF COLLEGE DISABILITY PROGRAMS:

Who reviews these college disability programs to determine if they are up to standard? What is the standard they must meet? Has anyone set down a standard that they must meet to qualify as a good disability program? We don’t think so. Sometimes we have self-promoting service providers who work at colleges announcing to the world via conferences, web sites, etc. that they have instigated model programs, or that they have created the best programs around. Who is to say that that is true without sophisticated, theoretical review? And sometimes there will be crackerjack programs, but how can they stand out when they have to compete with lesser quality programs if there is no independent, critical review that establishes what truly is a good or even exceptional program. Such review will also help consumers make educated choices regarding their college disability program selections. Statewide and even nationwide standards, along the lines of CARF standards and methods of review, are needed in these college disability programs.

PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION ABOUT COLLEGE DISABILITY PROGRAMS:

Further, in California members of the public may review the statistics about hospitals, nursing homes, etc. Where is any record about the efficacy of a college disability program maintained, that the public can research in order to decide which college disability programs are good programs? Information is maintained regarding whether or not hospitals and nursing homes meet standards to properly care for their patients. Deficiencies are reported. It is our understanding that no such nationwide or even statewide regulatory system exists regarding college disability programs. If and when regulations are formulated regarding college disability programs, there will need to be a database the public can access to read about the quality of a college’s disability related programming, the deficiencies of any program and the corrective actions required to meet basic standards.
Although our experience is in California, BIN invites residents of other states to pursue similar legislation in their own states.
See also: College Disability Programs
ABI/TBI Definitions, About BIN, Ban Dangerous Sports,Brain Injury Advocacy, Brain Injury Forums,Brain Injury Names, By and or Brain Injury Survivors, California Area BIN, Cautionary Tale, Classification, Contact Us, Chronic Disease?, Concussions and Football, Distribution List, Easy Version, Global Issues,Health Care Reform, Home, How You Can Help, Human, Legal and Civil Rights, Independence, International Standards, Laws and Legislation, Links, Mandated Reporters, National Standards, News, Online Community, Please Donate, Postsecondary Program Protocols, Post-TBI Syndrome, Privacy Policy, Protect Your Privacy Public Policy, Public Policy Index, Research/Clinical Trials/Studies, SABI Advocacy Forum, SEARCH, Shop OnLine and Help BIN, The Survivor Movement, The Survivors' Viewpoint,Terminology, Who Really Represents Us, Who We Are,Worldwide Brain Injury Community,Your Privacy Settings on the Internet
© Copyright 1998-2023. Brain Injury Network
All rights reserved.

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. By clicking Accept you consent to our use of cookies. Read about how we use cookies.

Your Cookie Settings

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. Read about how we use cookies.

Cookie Categories
Essential

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our websites. You cannot refuse these cookies without impacting how our websites function. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings, as described under the heading "Managing cookies" in the Privacy and Cookies Policy.

Analytics

These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are.